Sex dating in nathrop historical colorado
In addition, it identified ways to work with experts to prepare a case for trial even if the testimony will not be introduced.the public has deeply-rooted perceptions about sexual violence and about how victims of sexual assault should behave.Without the benefit of a proper explanation, however, jurors may wrongly interpret a victim’s actions during and after an assault as reasons not to believe the victim’s testimony.Expert testimony to explain victim behavior is often the best way to dispel myths and assist the jury to make an informed decision based on the evidence, viewed in its proper context.
Pre-Conference ~ Why They Fight the Facts and What to Do About It: Learning How to Respond to Victim Blaming Arguments, Myths about False Reporting and Folks Who Just Don't Get It, End Violence Against Women International.
20th Annual Joint Conference ~ Preventing Sexual Violence Through Assessment, Treatment and Safe Management, Massachusetts Adolescent Sex Offender Coalition and Massachusetts Association of the Treatment of Sexual Abusers.
, Woodbury School of Business, Weber State University, East-West Center, Texas A&M University San Antonio, Offutt School of Business, Center for Creative Leadership, Higher Education Resource Services and Humphrey School of Public Affairs.
public perceptions of how victims should respond to physical and emotional trauma often conflict with the way victims actually behave, and these misconceptions can severely affect the fact finders’ assessment of victim credibility and ultimate case outcome.
Experienced professionals familiar with victim behavior understand that victims have individual responses to trauma that are often counterintuitive to public expectations, but may be unable or unsure of how to explain this to the jury.